Robert Pattinson Interview with Australia's Sunday Herald Sun

Again - tiny spoiler at the end of this interview... read with care!

Mum's the word on R-Patz gossip!




AT 23, Robert Pattinson's chosen career is simmering along quite nicely, thank you, with the handsome London actor pulling in an estimated $20 million, give or take a few bucks, last year.

Having kicked into high gear playing Cedric Diggory in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (2005) before the hugely successful Twilight series, “R-Patz” (or sometimes even “Spunk Ransom”), as he is known, is the cause of instant hysteria among young women around the world and much innuendo in the gossip pages.

But he is in a relationship with his beautiful Twilight co-star, 19-year-old Kristen Stewart, and both are so in demand that you wouldn’t think they would have time to read anything salacious about themselves.

They don’t, but Pattinson gets reminded of it constantly, nevertheless.

“I still get my mum (Clare) calling me up every single day and questioning me about the gossip stuff,” he says with a slight shake of his head and a smile.

“I don’t like people I know reading that stuff about me because it kind of distorts everything. You’re inevitably going to find something bad eventually and I don’t want to be having to do PR to my family.”

Other than that, Pattinson’s sudden surge of fame through his vampire character, Edward Cullen, in the Twilight movie franchise has not overwhelmed him.

“My family has dealt with it really well,” he says. “I mean, they’re pretty untouched by it. My sisters (Victoria and chart-topping singer-songwriter Lizzy) are fine. They occasionally get their Facebook (pages) hacked into and stuff, but that’s the only downside.

“I’ve just been working in England and it’s the polar opposite to working in America. There’s no-one around the set and it is wholly different working there, so I’ve been getting to know what a normal life is like again.

“People are very different about it in London. If they do recognise me they’re embarrassed to say something and you can go into so many areas where people have no idea who you are.

“In London the other night I went out to have dinner in some pub somewhere and the barmaid had this whole conversation saying, ‘You look just like that guy from Twilight’. I was astonished because every time she came up she was like, ‘You literally could be his brother’ and she never put two and two together.”

But while Pattinson relishes his relative anonymity in England - in the US and elsewhere he inevitably draws a crowd - he sometimes struggles with whether or not he should just sweep fame up in his arms and embrace it.

“I’m wondering whether I’m holding on to something I should be letting go of by not changing anything,” he says.

“But, you know, I don’t particularly feel any different and I think because I’ve gone from job to job to job it means you stay in this sort of netherworld, so I feel relatively untouched.

“It’s kind of like accepting that you’re famous or just staying blind to it. I’m sort of wondering whether that’s the right way to go about things and whether it stops you growing as a person if you do that, but I don’t really know yet.”

He had one brief lesson in handling fame from Pierce Brosnan, who plays his father in the new film Remember Me, when the two went out to dinner together in New York.

“Some people were looking over,” Pattinson says. “They didn’t know who I was but they knew him, obviously. He went up to them and introduced himself and asked how their evening was going.

“At the time I was thinking like, 'What are you doing?’ but it worked fantastically because no-one treated him like he was a sideshow attraction any more and I’m sure those people went home and said what a nice guy he was.

“I don’t really have the confidence to do that yet, but it works better than my method, which is just hiding under the table or leaving immediately if anyone looks around.”

Pattinson’s box office appeal has reached such a high point now that he is a producer on Remember Me, with input to deliberations on matters such as casting with fellow producer Nick Osborne and director Alan Coulter, who is mainly known for TV (The Sopranos, Sex and the City) but also did the movie Hollywoodland (2006), starring Ben Affleck.

“But I’m such a novice at all this,” Pattinson says. “At the end of the day it’s the director’s decision about casting.”

Apart from Brosnan, the movie stars Academy Award winner Chris Cooper (Adaptation, 2002), Oscar nominee Lena Olin (Enemies: A Love Story, 1989) and Australian Emilie de Raven, one of the stars of the TV series Lost.

“I read with a bunch of girls and I watched all the tapes - which is unheard of, normally, for an actor to watch the audition tapes - and that was interesting and a kind of incredible thing to be allowed to do,” Pattinson says.

“Emilie was the best out of all of them and Alan thought she was way, way best before I had even met her, so that was lucky.

“She was great to work with. She is not ‘actressy’ at all, totally unpretentious, and she’s got a lot of spunk and fire in her.”

Set in New York, Remember Me stars Pattinson as Tyler, a rebellious young man who, since the suicide of his older brother, has had a troubled relationship with his father.

Soon after taking a beating at the hands of a police officer (Cooper), Tyler meets college student Ally (de Ravin), who he later discovers is the police officer’s daughter.

Tyler and Ally, however, become soul-mates and are happy, but then their relationship is suddenly threatened.

“As soon as I read the script I just sort of related to it in a fundamental way, right from the beginning,” Pattinson says.

“I don’t know why. But I just felt very connected to it the first time I read it and as all the rewrites happened and everything about it changed, I still always felt like everything about it was very true.

“It seemed like it was written for a reason.”

Maybe just to make Robert Pattinson even more famous.

Source

23 comments:

Gwen Cooper 426 said...

Kat, re your tag? Me too, me too!

And that pix just makes me sigh. (Out Loud.) Rob. Brooding. Guitar.


Re the article---starting to want to "grade" them. Slight rehash of old info mixed with new, but all in all, positive of movie and of Rob. LOL.

jessegirl said...

Most of us don't have to make decisions about what to do with fame. Speaking for myself, Thank God.

Rob, it seems, wonders whether to embrace it or "hold on to something I should let go of", presumably he means, trying to keep his 'normal' life as real as possible.The excerpts here make it a bit confusing to follow what Rob said.

Then he says something about "it stops you growing as a person". Does he mean embracing fame here? Or that trying to remain 'normal' stops you growing?

I, for one, don't want him to change. That said, being human means changing. I guess I mean I don't want him to change the core of himself--I think you all know what I mean--to embrace fame.

If it were me, I'd be really careful of fame, as Rob has been up to now, because it is a soul-sucker.
He now brushes against all the veteran A-listers, who are taking notice and beginning to take him seriously. Why not really join this crowd, he might think. Well, if it is made up of people like Pierce, okay. But... the dark side lurks, waiting for narcissism to take hold.

God, does any other actor think like this? If he just keeps thinking like this, he'll be fine. But if he's wondering to 'embrace' he's angling towards a decision.
Giving in?

Oh I know, he already needs all the bodyguards, et al, to protect him. That's so sad. I think he's wary of being isolated in the bubble of fame, and he is right to be cautious, to hold onto that down-to-earth normality, that extraordinary feeling of ordinariness which is so much a part of him now.
It is so beautiful.

We here wax poetic about those sorts of qualities about Rob, the endearing, self-deprecating, authentic, humble and kind being he is now. We don't want that to leave. Do we?

How do all of you see this?

Anonymous said...

After reading this, I wander if it's not a made up interview like most of the stuff published in Australian press...

Maryann said...

I do not think it is only in UK he has some level of anonymity..I think that it would be the case in several countries around Europe to be honest. Cos really the Twilight hysteria, esp here in Norway only peaks when a DVD is released or a new movie in the saga is released. Apart from that it doesn't show up in the media that much here...Rob and esp Kristen is hardly ever mentioned, and if they are it is nonsense gossip in small articles.

So the hysterial still really is in US and probably Canada. Sorry but that is my impression. I may be wrong but I cannot help shake that feeling.

That is however a good thing for Rob, means he can travel and go places atleast here in Europe without being HOUNDED like crazy. I guess when they move the filming of Bel Ami to Hungary in April time will tell how hysterical things will be once they start doing outdoor shoots. But something tells me curiousity yes but downright Remember Me hysteria like in NYC? Doubtful.

And I am 100% sure that applies to Norway too, if Rob was ever to film here...(doubt that will ever happen lol).

Kelly Louise said...

“In London the other night I went out to have dinner in some pub somewhere and the barmaid had this whole conversation saying, ‘You look just like that guy from Twilight’. I was astonished because every time she came up she was like, ‘You literally could be his brother’ and she never put two and two together.”

I'm sure if/when she reads this interview, she'll be like "aww shucks" haha.

I agree completely with that jessegirl, I hope - and think, that he will be above it all and stay true to himself, not give into fame. As long as he surrounds himself with his friends and family from London and is with a girl like Kristen, I'm sure he'll be fine. Those are the people he needs to be able to keep his feet firmly on the ground. But I know that if I were an actor, I would make different decisions on scripts than he is currently doing. I'd want to keep fame at a distance as much as possible, not seek it out by doing very much A-list movies. He wants the hysteria around him to die down yet he continues to do films with people like Pierce Brosnan, Uma Thurman and Sean Penn (hey, not that I blame him). But, you know, I'm pretty sure he's stronger than all of that. He's just trying to pick roles that'll challenge him as an actor, and he'll learn what to make of the struggle that is fame. I truly hope so, at least.

HeneciaD said...

@sissi I am thinking same too honey because of the part starts with he is ine a relationsship with kris

jc(britlover) said...

I love you just the way you are!!!

FILTM

Capitu Santiago said...

Aww, Kat, I want to keep him, too... He is adorable...
Loved how Pierce dealt with the people at the restaurant. Daddy-Bros is teaching Robler some things.
Jeez, Rob, you don't have to hide under the table... this was so cute!

'Aww, Beloved, have a magical sunday! I'm counting the days to go see RM'...

Muah! :x

Colleen said...

@RobsessiveRobsbondgirl @sissidelyon Agreed, and it saddens me because i am an Aussie and i thought that they were above making things up. :( Oh well.

jmm4832 said...

jessegirl said:

We here wax poetic about those sorts of qualities about Rob, the endearing, self-deprecating, authentic, humble and kind being he is now. We don't want that to leave. Do we?

I would be very disappointed if Rob didn't remain this humble and kind guy. To me that is a large part of why I love Rob.

MMc said...

jessegirl

We love Rob just like he is .........don't want him to change but as you said, life and experience will inevitably make him change, mature, have a different view of himself, family and friends and fans.

If the people around him stay honest and true that will help but when they start kissing up and acting all like he's so wonderful and fantastic - that is very spoiling and really gets to your head.

He needs honest people keeping him grounded and real.........us fans are NOT going to do it........we put him on a pedastal, we bow to his feet, scream and cry and say we love him when we don't even know him.........fans like us are not going to help him stay grounded and real...........but ain't it fun!!

I had a small brush with fame when I performed in a rock band and we had lots of fans who liked us and it was so easy to make friends cause they were just always there being nice and all........but when the band broke up.........I was so depressed for about 2 years. The people were gone, the friends were gone, the free drinks were gone, the attention and recognition was gone, I had to learn all over again how to fit into society, how to make friends - that it was a give and take thing and just giving my talent wasn't enough anymore. It was like a divorce in a way.

So I just hope Rob does have those true friends and honest family members who keep him grounded and out of the clouds - I think he will.

jmm4832 said...

Fame comes and goes so it's very important for Rob to stay connected via his roots, good friends like the Brit pack and his family. They will be there for him long after the hearthrob status wanes and someday it will.

lallieb said...

Yes, I'm very skeptical of the authenticity of this interview. Just this week on The View, when the topic of his parents reading the tabloids about him was mentioned, he looked right at Mum and said "I dunnno, do you?" She shook her head and did a finger zip over her mouth. There was too much regurgitation of things he's said in the past.

@jesse, definitely a large part of his appeal. It would be a shame to have fame change him too much, but given how famous he is at this moment in time, God knows he doesn't seem to have changed much since the hoopla began - he's only got better, which is a good sign. I admit I was worried he might not be as forthcoming in interviews, retreat a bit, give rehearsed responses, get more serious, but nope, he has been for the most part, the same delicious Rob.

jessegirl said...

All of you are so smart. I loved your thoughts.

Femroc, I know what you mean about fans not being among those who would keep him grounded..."but ain't it fun!" Yeah, it is, otherwise why are we here?
Your brush with fame sounds interesting so you would be acquainted perhaps with the feelings that go with that, how people view you and behave towards you just because of that.

I dunno, maybe, in the unlikely scenario that I should ever know him, I'd like to think I could be the complex person I am and be a fan but also be real.

I know, I know, you're thinking, who is she kidding, she'll drool with the best--rest--of us. But maybe I could keep my drool well hidden?

Sissidelyon, I can never tell whether these things are made up or not. How are you guys so smart to suspect? Do you thing the waitress story is true? Then, as Kelly Louise says, "aw shucks."

Thanks for the thoughts. :)

solas said...

Jesse--I agree that in these aspects especially, we don't want Rob to change. And although some change may be part of being human, not all change is good or neccessary. Wisdom is partly knowing what and how and when to change, if at all. Rather than saying change is an integral part of being human, I might use the word 'growth.' Change for the sake of change, or worse for the sake of giving in to demands to the powers that be, or to those who make arbitrary standards, such as in fashion ('You cannot wear white shoes after labour day') or in the awards games ('you cannot get an award until you've paid your dues)is definitely not change to embrace. Growth, by examning one's behaviour and chucking the stuff one deems or realizes as no longer good or relevant, by experienceing and processing the world around us, IS a lifelong process to embrace.

MMc said...

“I’m wondering whether I’m holding on to something I should be letting go of by not changing anything,” he says.

What does Rob mean by this? I'm not sure what he's trying to say but somehow it worries me.

solas said...

All too often there is a noxious and obnoxous tendency to manipulate people, especially youg people, by telling them their instincts are wrong or immature, that they have to let go in order to be part of the world. But there is nothing wrong with wanting to maintain one's life and one's self, even if one is 'famous' without letting the fame affect or change one's self. Someone has to remind Rob: illegitimi non carborundum.

jessegirl said...

Femroc,
Yeah, I know what you mean about the confusing and a bit worrying statement you referred to...So did I wonder. What did Rob mean?

Solas,
Yes, change is quite different from growth in human development and I'm glad you pointed it out.

Ah, wisdom. Knowing when, how and even whether to change oneself. There's the rub. Not easy determining that in one's own life, not easy to be objective enough about oneself to know what growth means.

Perhaps it means taking another direction, or perhaps it means going deeper or looking at things more broadly or maybe just staying still. Or all of these at different times and circumstances.

I think that's where one's deep intuition about one's Self must kick in. How should one go forward remaining true to oneself yet be open to encountering the wider world, with the different perspectives to be found there?

I think, regarding Robert, I'd use the "to thine own self be true" line. Intuitively he knows what that means, and intuitively he will sense when he's veered from it by giving in to inauthenticity.

Others here have mentioned that if he sticks with his good friends and family, they will help keep him grounded. Yeah, and bop him on the head if he gets full of himself. But with huge fame these relationships are bound to change, hopefully to grow positively, but maybe not.

Your second comments about young people in general made me think of my own childhood and adolescence, during which I so often felt that I had to deny my real self, almost betray myself, in order to fit in, to be or become what others (not necessarily just adults) wanted me to be. I guess part of that is conformity, but I think you meant more than that. We all go through it and it doesn't end with adolescence but perhaps is most keenly felt then.

Oh heck, I don't know what I'm talking about anymore.
I guess there's a purity--for lack of a better word--which I see in Rob, (not innocence), which I hope will stay with him. And that goofiness like when he talked to Ellen about his clown car.

And why should I care how he matures, what qualities of value he takes forward and what he leaves behind in order to unfold as he was meant to? I find this caring about someone famous as annoying as it is compelling. Is it somehow supposed to be instructive to me? Because I sure as heck can't influence him.


Not sure what that Latin phrase you used means. Smarty pants. :)

solas said...

There is so much I would love to respond to in your posting, Jesse, but I have not the time and i don't know who would have the patience to read it. Trying to keep it short or concise:
Purity is a good word, but mostly I think of him as REAL. And seeing that in ANYONE means more to me than I can express; it is so rare, especially in anyone visible. And I can relate so much to what you say about your chldhood and adolescence. A sense of belonging is a healthy thing, especially for a child, and that often translates into conforming. But it does all go beyond conformity when it is forced on you, when a square peg is forced into round holes because a world of round holes is all most people can tolerate and handle. Another broken peg in a hole, another brick in the wall. Theoretically a child has a choice between either being like everyone else, conforming, or by developing parallel or even opposite the 'standard' or mainstream, but in reality the need to belong results in forcing the standards of conformity upon himself. (I personally made the choice at age 11 to be myself, and true to myself, when I saw what people wanted me to be and do was not what I wanted.) Sometimes this attitude is a sign of strength and mighty self-awareness and self-worth, but sometimes it is anger, spite, oppositional disorder, etc.; hence the extra resistance by grown-ups.
For sure it is so keenly felt in adolescence, because that is a time of breaking away from the first social unit (home and parents) and establishing one's own identity and path.
Caring about how ROb develops? Sure, it can be seen as annoying, and for sure compelling, but aside from the fact I care about anyone I know about, and especially hope for chldren to develop into healthy good kind adults, Rob is not only out there, a vibrant sample of humanity and the future, but he is, getting back to the beginning of this posting, 'pure', REAL (in a good way-- you can have a REALLY bad person who is Real and true to himself, too), and I for one don't want to see that sullied or ruined. How could we not care that such a beautiful soul in the works would remain beautiful and would grow in a good and beautiful way!

jessegirl said...

Solas,
I'll keep this short too.
Thanks so much for engaging in this. I find it stimulating and helpful. I hope you do to. Others can take or leave it as they wish.

What I meant about being annoyed at myself if that Rob is this famous heartthrob, not a person in my sphere, or vice versa. That being the case, there is perhaps a bit of idolatry involved, idolizing him. I've referred to it at other times. It's about a pathetic relating to someone who can't relate to you; it's one-way and seems not right. I'm too realisitc to be deluded that it is real, but annoyed that I can't help caring for him.
Again, I'm unable to express myself on this.

Your last bit was perfect and perhaps we should end there: "...Rob is not only out there, a vibrant example of humanity and the future, but he is...pure, REAL [in a good way...) and I for one don't want to see that sullied or ruined. How can we not care that such a beautiful soul in the works [world?] would remain beautiful and would grow in a good and beautiful way.!"

Oh my God, Solas, that's it. PERFECT. It almost made me cry reading that. For me, just knowing Rob is out there walking the earth is a cause for hope and happiness.

Thanks!

jessegirl said...

Hah, short.
As short as I get.

solas said...

'World' works there as well, and you must know me to be such a terrible typist that I sometimes have the wrong word, but this time I actually did mean 'works'-- his soul is a work in a progress sort of--I believe we are all given a soul and challenges in life to develop and refine that soul by means of the choices we make, how we liveour lives, how much we allows that soul to guide us as opposed to letting the physical world and peer/social pressures, etc, influence our selves.
Soul in the works.

jessegirl said...

Solas,
'soul in the works'. Works for me.

My typing is pretty bad too.

 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...