Does Robert Pattinson Need Rescuing?

Emmmmm NO! But if you ever do Rob just give me a shout and I'll be right there.



Someone rescue Robert Pattinson

Looks like there may be a good actor lurking behind the pretty face, but he needs a mentor

Robert Pattinson, the smouldering star of the Twilight franchise, is the most besieged heartthrob on the planet, and you can’t blame him for being embarrassed by the adulation. He acts as if he’s been confused with someone else—which is true, in the sense that his fans seem to have him hopelessly mixed up with his Byronic character, the vampire Edward Cullen. He can’t leave his hotel room without being mobbed by teenage girls. Last week, when he showed up for a taping of The Daily Show, the screams from the teenage audience reduced Jon Stewart’s high altar of smart satire into The Ed Sullivan Show waylaid by Beatlemania. Which Pattinson seemed to find no less ludicrous than his host. But the more he sloughs off the attention with that twitchy, self-deprecating English charm, the more charismatic he seems. He’s Hugh Grant trapped in the body of a young Brando.

In an age of carefully groomed celebrity, Pattinson is a rare thing: the self-effacing superstar. The 23-year-old actor has good reason to feel sheepish. All we’ve seen him do is pose as an oddly chivalrous vampire in a couple of jejune vampire movies. There’s no denying his screen presence, and it looks like there may be a pretty good actor lurking behind the pretty face. But as his fame outstrips his work, he must feel pressure to prove it.


Now we can see Pattinson tackle a (somewhat) more serious role in Remember Me. Directed by Allen Coulter (Hollywoodland), it’s a more mature movie than Twilight, and his character is painfully mortal, but it’s still a romance. Despite some promising romantic comedy that bubbles up as boy meets girl, it soon gives way to earnest drama. With a backstory rooted in tragedy, the film is set in New York in the summer before Sept. 11, 2001. Which means someone is on a collision course with destiny: tears before bedtime.

But Pattinson gets to relax into the role of a leading man who seems a lot like himself, if celebrity interviews are to be believed—a shambling overgrown adolescent with a messy room and a big heart. As Tyler, the estranged son of a callous tycoon (Pierce Brosnan with a Brooklyn accent), he’s a harmless wastrel. And he spends the first act with his Adonis features cut and bruised from a nightclub brawl. On a dare from his roommate, Tyler tracks down the daughter of the policeman (Chris Cooper) who arrested him, and talks her into a date without revealing the connection. Ally (Emilie de Ravin) is a college student who has her own issues with her dad, a hard-boiled cop from Queens. Tyler and Ally meet, cute and romantic repartee ensues, and for a while the movie comes alive—until family secrets emerge and the, uh, healing begins. Pattinson and his frisky co-star have good chemistry, but they’re stuck on a narrowing road to cheap sentiment.

Pattinson may seem cut out for an iconic role as a rebel without a cause, but these days it’s not easy for a heartthrob to find that kind of heft in a Hollywood movie. Brando exploded out of the gate fully formed, as a matinee idol with gravitas in A Streetcar Named Desire (1954). James Dean led a revolution in ennui with his film debut, East of Eden (1955). And Warren Beatty ignited his career as a leading man in the potent melodrama of Splendor in the Grass (1961), his first film. All three movies became classics and all, coincidentally, were directed by Elia Kazan.

So what’s a renegade heartthrob to do in an era where romance, not just sci-fi, is ruled by formula, and where the actors are so much better than the movies? Like Brando and Dean, Pattinson is an insouciant sex symbol with an alluring sensitivity, but Twilight is no Splendor in the Grass. Until he won the Hollywood lottery, he felt like a misfit—ever since landing his first serious stage role in London’s West End, and being fired before opening night. He tended to get cast as weirdos, from the vile Alec in a stage version of Tess of the d’Urbervilles to the young Salvador Dali in the film Little Ashes. Now he’s like a rock star without a band.

While he waits for a mentor to rescue him from the teen hordes—the way Martin Scorsese adopted Titanic’s Leonardo DiCaprio—Pattinson is making some bold choices. Co-starring with Uma Thurman, he’ll indulge in some dangerous liaisons as a Paris womanizer in Bel Ami, a film saturated with steamy sex scenes. A virtuous vampire needs to rough up his image. He’s also starring in Unbound Captives, a low-budget western in which he speaks mostly in Comanche. That’s one way to leave your fans in the dust.

Source Macleans.Ca

17 comments:

Annie said...

Dude, that is a hangover if I ever saw one.

Kate said...

LMAO oops I wish I could use that as an excuse! LOL

Unknown said...

WHY can't people let him BE without all the oh-we-care attitude? He's almost 24, he knows what he's doing and he CAN make his own choices. Trust him.

rpattzgirl survived Rob! said...

IT'S Rose,

if anything he is rescuing US from the boring cookie cutter "I'm so prefect, I only date models or Disney characters, and star in big blow em up movies" type of Hollywood heart throbs.

Thank god for Rob, he tescues me everyday, hangovers & all....

Meeno said...

Roger Ebert review: says movie is well made, did not delve on Robert's acting chops . . . 2nd time he'd done that, first Little Ashes, now Remember Me; although he bashed the acting of the actors "not Robert's specifically" in New Moon.
Which means really that Roger Ebert is still reserving his judgment about Robert Pattinson --- unlike so many other critics who are jumping the gun. . . . gonna see it in about 4 hours!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! with my mother!!!! then tomorrow with my significant others!!!

AP said...

@Meeno: Ebert did say he cared about the characters, despite a little hit at Rob's 'idol' status. lol He also said of Tyler and Ally: "Their courtship is a sensitive, well-acted progression through stages of mutual trust and Tyler's gradual rediscovery of his own real feelings." That sounds like a thumbs up to me. And ITA :)

noisefaidaus said...

What I like about this article is he is not criticizing Rob, it is the fact that many movies these days follow a formula and that Rob chose the best the only one that stood from a lot of scripts that he himself said were all the same.

The writer acknowledges that though "Remember Me" may not be Rob's break out movie that he does have talent, and that he is making gutsy choices when it comes to future films.
Perhaps he is doing this to dissociate himself from being just a celebrity and to be taken as a serious actor by not just his fans but his peers.

Rob has said many times himself that he is still learning and growing as an actor and I expect we will see exceptional performances from him in the future, perhaps even and Oscar winning performance.

But the critics and reviews aside I will never be detracted from seeing a Robert Pattinson movie because of what "they" have to say. I believe that he is very talented, and has a very bright future ahead of him.
Go gettem Rob!

Unknown said...

i do think he needs a mentor, like tim burton was one for johnny depp, scorcese for dicaprio, he needs someone by his side, i just don't know if that's gonna happen, but i hope it does, it would be great for him i'm sure of that. i always think of quentin tarantino. a girl can dream right?

Leenie FJ said...

Have any of these morons bothered to watch his other movies? Just because they weren't American doesn't mean they don't exist, lol. I loved his geeky self in Bad Mother's Handbook.

Barbara said...

It's gratifying to see that some critics do get Rob. I particularly liked his line, "In an age of carefully groomed celebrity, Pattinson is a rare thing: the self-effacing superstar."

Great day, isn't it ladies?

FILTM!

Anonymous said...

I agree with Rose. And it annoys me that they don't give him any credit for playing Edward, Edward is good complex character, playing Edward requires a lot more than pausing and that's what they don't want to awknowledge. I'm not saying that they should praise him for playing Edward, I couldn't care less for critics' opinions, but don't bash him for it and downplay Edward's character just because Edward appeals to a female audience.

Plus I don't like how they keep saying teenage, when most of his fans and a very large portion of the Twilight fans are adult females.

And second how come no one says that Leo has put himself in a box because we all know that Scorsesse (sp?) directs and makes certain types of movies, basically the suspense/thriller genre movies...so how come no body says that Leo has put himself in a box because he's made a whole bunch of those types of overdone movies.

And please Robert has much more charisma than Leo ever had, and I would hope that he wouldn't waste his career doing unappealing/boring movies just to win some critic over. I love that, so far, he seems to be choosing good romantic and dramatic roles.

But Robert can't consider doing more than a few love story/romance/drama movies? Because then they'll start harping on him putting himself in a box? double standards much? I hope that Robert will not listen to any critics, and that he will pick good romantic and dramatic movies, with appealing characters and storylines.

I would also love to see Robert in another intense epic romance setting, but not paranormal this time...*sigh*

KatKat said...

ooh ooh Can I rescue him???

Please please please???

Yelida said...

The part that I just don't get is why they keep considering him a "teen idol"?!!! Maybe we should ALL state how old we are so people can see he has grown fans!! You don't need to be a teenager to like a movie star...I'm 26, almost 27 and I loved him from day one!!
Critics need to STOP being so narrow minded and see what a global phenomenon Rob is

annieEvilRobPornPusher said...

may be a pretty good actor??????

Jane said...

Where most of the remember me reviews written by men. Now, I can see why they were negative. All the men would give their left, well, you know, to be like Rob for one day and by that hunky, gorgeous, sexy and too many other things I could mention. Movie was wonderfule, gong again tomorrow.

carmela said...

I think the reason he didn´t attend Oscars it´s because he is no longer considered as a teen idol, he´s growing as an actor and of course as a man as it´s showed in his last role in remember me.
Anyway, congratulations Rob, people from lot of countries support your performances and will always wish u have the best choice and of course the best luck.

lallieb said...

I actually think this article had some good points. Rob is unique in the annals of Hollywood "heart-throb" actors he referenced, there was no internet for one when they started their careers. Rob's huge popularity and trajectory is an anomaly thanks to Twilight. Although a mentor/director might be a wise career choice, I would not like to see Rob do anything that doesn't feel right or true to himself. Perhaps his choices may not always be right for his career, but he never really expected to have an acting career, so was not invested in having one. He sure as shit never thought he would be one of the most famous man on the planet at the age of 23 after one movie. He will do what feels right with (hopefully) sage advice from his agent, friends and family. Rob is a square peg that critics and industry insiders are trying to fit into a round hole. I for one like that.

 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...