The Ravishing of Robert Pattinson

We need to remind Nancy to put 'Pattinson' in between that robsessed and the .com - she'd have much more fun! I guess she doesn't get the appeal (poor thing) - but she makes some good points about the craziness that surrounds Rob when he's on a press tour like this.



The Ravishing of Rob Pattinson
By NANCY DEWOLF SMITH

In a recent survey of 130,000 women by iVillage Entertainment, 87% said they would trade their husband for British actor Robert Pattinson. Clearly, some of them were kidding. The rest will just have to accept that the 23-year-old Mr. Pattinson, like the romantic vampire Edward Cullen he embodies in the "Twilight" movie series, is unlikely ever to cross their paths outside the realm of dreams.

Until now, most of those dreams were sweet or at least private ones. Yet as Mr. Pattinson made the rounds in New York this week to promote his new, nonvampire movie, "Remember Me," the spectacle of his sexploitation—how else to put it?—was grotesque. What's being wrecked is the essence of his appeal, and he's really not old enough to safeguard it.

Whatever Pattinson-appreciation is built on, the gateway drug for most women (and fewer men) is Stephenie Meyer's "Twilight," a classic saga of young love. The twist is that Edward hasn't been human since he was bitten by a vampire in 1918, and yet he soulfully strives to protect Bella, the ordinary girl who returns his affection, from his own monstrous fate.

A beautiful man with the will and strength to maintain eternal devotion? A few joyless types missed the big picture and veered off on tangents about stalking and other tedious subjects. But most girls got it instantly, and adult women perked up as if from a torpor—even if they could only sneak off to Robsessed.com and other Web sites after the children and a resentful husband or boyfriend were asleep. Then, they talk about Mr. Pattinson as if he were their own personal brand of heroin. "I'm addicted," a mother of four laments. "When will it end?" "O.M.G. When will we wake up?" types someone else. "When he's 40? 50?"

After more than a year of mainstream-culture derision aimed at so-called twitards, vindication of a kind arrived in the March issue of a trendy men's magazine, Details. There, a headline finally asks the $64,000 question: "So the Woman You Love Has the Hots for a Vampire. What Does That Say About You?" Nothing good. But the worm turns again elsewhere in the same issue, in a creepy photo spread where Mr. Pattinson appears fully clad but looking dwarfed and diminished by a towering phalanx of naked female models.

Of this demeaning experience, Mr. Pattinson later had the insouciance to remark that it was made bearable by a hangover. The fangs are out for him, however. As one woman blogged about the Details shoot, he is now "the most objectified young man of modern times." Throw in the sexual catcalling and increasingly smutty questions from interviewers, and he probably "spends half his life having femininity (for good or bad) thrust in his face."

Jimmy Fallon, bless him, put his guest up a tree for a funny skit Monday. Back in the studio, though, the banshees wailed so crazily that both men looked wary and Mr. Pattinson said: "Help."

Fat chance. On ABC's "The View" Tuesday, even the presence of Mr. Pattinson's parents and sisters in the audience could not prevent the lady interviewers of a certain age from instigating talk of intimate body parts, male and female.

All this, and worse, is now rushing toward a man whose greatest asset has been not just a handsome face, but an apparent abundance of youthful innocence. It has allowed young girls to imagine a happy future, and moved older women to tears with the memory of a happier past.

Now that Mr. Pattinson is a bona fide Hollywood commodity, a maw is opening to devour him. Even Edward Cullen couldn't stop that.

Source

207 comments:

«Oldest   ‹Older   201 – 207 of 207   Newer›   Newest»
noisefaidaus said...

I really love this site. Very rarely do you run into "judgmental know it alls" here.
The regulars here are always willing to entertain a different opinions without attacking you. As long as you treat them with respect you'll always get it back from them.
But if you need to be put in your place their not afraid to do that either.

Lemonless said...

Hi all, I had my two penn'orth on another thread about this article last night, but as I've had time for reflection and I've read the excellent points made by you all (especially Jessegirl, and Solas) I thought I'd just add another ha'penny.

The counter argument 'would you feel the same about 5 old men and a young starlet on the sofa' would be consistent if the power dynamic of these two propositions were the same, but they're not.

On a physical level, most men are stronger than most women: that's just a fact. The imposition, over time, of a civil society has helped to dampen down the dominance of physicality, somewhat, so that little boys are indoctrinated not to hit little girls because it's wrong (no other argument needed).

Now, when 5 women hit on a male star in front of a live audience, what of the power differential there? Do five women equal one man? And in what way? If they were four women, or three, would the impact of their words be lessened?

Now imagine 5 Jon Stewarts sitting on a sofa with Emilie and Rob. (Don't forget that Emilie was there, however silent she was.)What of the power differential now? Would the viewer be anxious that Emilie was being baited by the male equivalents of the cougar? What of her co-star: what help was being given there? [By the way, I thought Rob did try to include Emilie a little, but he was on a roll, as far as I could see.] What if there were four John Stewarts, or three?

Do you see where I'm going with this, or am I just being a bit preachy?

jessegirl said...

GwenCooper: Thanks for the advice about the novel. I really appreciate it. And for your interesting comments.

Lemonless: Thanks for entering the discussion with interesting comments about the power ratio, men to women, and vice-versa. I think it is really important that many of us are thinking about these things, trying to see other perspectives. It is hard for me, sometimes, to get off my feminist soap box.

Solas: Your comments to puddle regarding people who are psychologically 'off' was, however, itself disturbing, because, in a printed forum like this, where we only 'know' each other by the written words we use, complete with quirks, we actually know less about one another than we know about Rob, because, even with emoticons, our expressions and our immediate reactions cannot be seen. Although our thoughts should speak for themselves too, I guess.

I know you have not responded to many of my posts nor have I to manyh of yours or other people's, but now I, too, wonder if I am one of those you consider 'disturbed'.

Everyone:
I try my best to be articulate but I might come across in a way I am unaware of, esp. if I am ignored (not saying Solas is, just saying).

I think it is difficult, in threads like this, with time zone and work schedule differences, to have satisfying 'debates' or discussions because one group goes to bed and the next gets up, while the first group doesn't return to the thread the next day, perhaps missing interesting new posts. So, continuity is lost, and people are left hanging (as I think I will be here).

I apologize to all and sundry about my loooong posts. I guess I just find this to be a thought provoking site as well as a celebratory one.

I'm sorry if I sound like I'm ranting or self-important or like a know-it-all (although I know I'm not the only know-it-all here). Anyway, this has been a very interesting thread and I appreciate every person's point of view, -even the disturbing ones. I hope to learn from you all. And to be open-minded.

Gwen Cooper 426 said...

Very well said, Jesse! ; ) And thank you! You're right, we tend to "lose threads" at times and in the process, we sometimes abandon what was the beginning (or middle, or end) of a great philosophical discussion!

That said, I so love this one!
; ) I will admit, that I've left certain threads because a) have nothing worthwhile to contribute, b) it's became too "volatile" and/or c) it just got lost in the thread "shuffle".

To me, this thread has been absolutely fascinating, most likely because I was actively participating (LOL). I hope no one feels that their views are not welcome and respected here. I truly feel that all views are appreciated (well, except for those of TROLLS, but that's another subject entirely).

I'm also more than just "a bit" of a feminist myself and wish that we could dedicate more time to THAT discussion as well!

ITA, Jesse, on both time zones and the fact that we only see each others words and are very likely missing certain nuances, if not entire points at times! And long posts no longer bother me---it's cathartic to express complete thoughts at times! Please continue!

And, as Solas has offered hers too, my email is GwenCooper426@aol.com and I welcome any and all discussions! (There are so many things I would love to discuss, but feel are constrained by time.)

If anyone is interested, I'd be happy to host an email discussion of any given topic, once a week! (Think book club, only more towards a social, religious or political commentary! Which would include just about anything we could think of!)

It could be fun! Literary? Social mores of feminism in various countries? The effects of fame on youth? : )

If anyone is interested, email me! I'll compile a list and coordinate!

Hugs!
With peace and love,
Gwen

noisefaidaus said...

All good comments so I think we all feel free enough here to agree to disagree if our opinions clash.

jessegirl said...

Gwen,
Thank you for the answer! I really appreciate it and also your interesting take on things. I've noticed your comments before and have rarely posted back.
I guess it is a new format of communication for me and I don't do things like the majority seem to.

Thx for your email. I might follow up.
And thx for not making me feel bad about my long posts. Anyone can just scroll past, I'm sure, if they aren't interested, or see my name and think, uh-oh, here she goes again.

You know I love long ones from others if they put a bit of thought into them. I think a lot of us who post here are 'thinkers' as well as Robsessed.

I'm at work now, but I'll get back to you.

Yeah, peace, love. :))

solas said...

Jesse--I am not ignoring you. Sorry if I give that impression.
Re determining if people I do not know, except what they write here, are disturbed; I am trained to do that. And although it is true that it is not 100% accurate, a few who have posted over time are clearly in need of help. Nevertheless, you can see even by yourself and others thinking I am hostile or ignoring, that words can be misudnerstood. Some ramblngs and expressions are pretty clear though.

«Oldest ‹Older   201 – 207 of 207   Newer› Newest»
 
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...